Answer each question for each case study in 1 sentence.
1. Case name:
2. What is the Issue of the case?
3. What is the answer to the Issue question?
4. What special circumstances made the verdict questionable or harder to rule on than normal?
5. What laws does the case involve?
6. What other cases did the court use to justify their decision?
7. Was this an instance of judicial activism? Why?
8. Is this a narrow or broad holding? Why?
9. Who is affected by the decision?
10. Do you agree with the decision? Why?
Chapter 8
8.2 Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981
8.3 Barbara Grutter v. Lee
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-241
8.4 Jennifer Gratz v. Lee Bollinger
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-516
8.6 University o
f California Regents v. Allan Bakke
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1979/76-811
8.6 University of California Regents v. Allan Bakke
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1979/76-811
Chapter 9
9.1 Exemplaire Exantus v. Harbor Bar & Brasserie Restaurant
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/2:2009cv02693/228903/15/
9.2 Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.
https://casetext.com/case/gibson-v-american-greetings-corp-2
9.4 Michael Green v. City of Philadelphia
https://casetext.com/case/green-v-city-of-philadelphia-2
9.5 Lynette Barrett, W.T. Melton v. Whirlpool Corp.
https://casetext.com/case/barrett-v-whirlpool-corp-1
9.7 Harold W. Hansborough, Jr. v. City of Elkhart Parks and Recreation
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/802/199/1650204/
Answer each question for each case study in 1 sentence.
1. Case name:
2. What i
