Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges


Home » Uncategorized » Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges

 Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges

Healthcare consists of individuals with health problems and the professionals who care for them. These combinations require at least two levels of expertise. One area concerns the medical treatments that may lead to positive outcomes. The other level of expertise concerns the decision-making process and communication with patients and families. This competency consists of five separate sections that work together to illustrate the judgements involved in patient care, which often includes ethical issues concerning patients, families, and quality care.

This assessment has six parts. Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.

Part One: Principles of Autonomy and Nonmaleficence

  • An 83-year-old diabetic male, Mr. Jones, is brought into the emergency department because of respiratory distress by his care-giving daughter, with whom he lives. In examining him, the emergency department physician discovers that Mr. Jones has gangrene on his right foot up to his ankle. Mr. Jones’ daughter reports that her father has been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. A preliminary capacity assessment is consistent with mild dementia but one of the nurses suggests that Mr. Jones’ confusion might be the result of his respiratory distress, coupled with the disorienting atmosphere of the emergency department. The clinical recommendation is to perform a below-the-knee amputation. The patient refuses this surgery, saying he has lived long enough and wants to die with his body intact.
  • Does the father have autonomy to make this decision? Why or why not?
  • Discuss the principle of nonmaleficence as it relates to actions of the providers. (1–2 pages)

Autonomy, the principle of self-determination, is a fundamental ethical concept in healthcare. It asserts that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own care, free from coercion or undue influence. In the case of Mr. Jones, his refusal of the below-the-knee amputation due to his desire to die with his body intact reflects his exercise of autonomy. Despite his Alzheimer’s diagnosis and mild dementia, Mr. Jones still retains the capacity to make decisions about his own healthcare, as determined by the preliminary capacity assessment.


However, the concept of autonomy is not absolute. It must be balanced with other ethical principles, such as beneficence (the duty to do good) and nonmaleficence (the duty to do no harm). In this case, the clinical recommendation for the below-the-knee amputation is based on the principle of beneficence, as it aims to prevent further harm (the spread of gangrene and potential complications) and promote Mr. Jones’ overall health and well-being.


The principle of nonmaleficence is particularly relevant here. While the healthcare providers have a duty to act in the best interests of the patient, they must also consider the potential harm that may result from their actions. In this case, performing the amputation against Mr. Jones’ wishes would be a violation of his autonomy and could cause psychological harm, as he has clearly expressed his desire to die with his body intact. Additionally, given his Alzheimer’s diagnosis, there may be concerns about his ability to fully understand and consent to the procedure.


The healthcare team must carefully weigh the competing ethical principles at play and engage in open communication with Mr. Jones and his daughter to ensure that his wishes and values are respected. Alternative treatment options, such as palliative care to manage his symptoms and maintain his comfort, should be explored and discussed with the patient and his family. Ultimately, respecting Mr. Jones’ autonomy while upholding the principle of nonmaleficence requires a patient-centered approach that prioritizes his preferences and values while also considering his best interests and overall well-being.

 Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges

Part Two: Clinical Ethics

  • Clinical ethics requires grasping ethical issues, such as informed consent, truth-telling, confidentiality, end-of-life care, treatment futility, pain relief, and patients’ rights to self-determination. For each hypothetical situation described below, identify the conflicting ethical principles involved, and select at least one appropriate action to resolve conflicting ethical principles in each case. (2–3 paragraphs for each topic)
    • An elderly patient suffers cardiac arrest and enters the intensive care unit. Her son insists that “everything possible” be done for her, and yet, she slips into a coma and is nonresponsive for months. As a healthcare administrator who oversees the organization, what steps would you recommend to address the son’s concerns?
    • You are a healthcare administrator reviewing statistics on lab tests ordered and realize that a few physicians account for the majority of orders of a certain very expensive lab test. You do a bit of research and realize that these physicians have relationships with the manufacturers of this testing equipment. What are your next steps?   Please write a brief policy statement about conflicts of interest in the organization.

In the first scenario involving the elderly patient in cardiac arrest, the conflicting ethical principles are likely to include beneficence (the duty to do good) and autonomy (the right to self-determination). The son’s insistence on “everything possible” being done for his mother reflects a desire to promote her well-being, which aligns with the principle of beneficence. However, prolonging aggressive medical interventions when the patient is nonresponsive and in a coma may conflict with the patient’s autonomy and dignity. The patient’s quality of life and preferences should be considered in decisions about continuing or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.


To address the son’s concerns, as a healthcare administrator, it is important to facilitate open and empathetic communication between the healthcare team and the family. This may involve convening a multidisciplinary meeting to discuss the patient’s prognosis, treatment options, and goals of care. Providing the family with clear and understandable information about the patient’s condition and likely outcomes can help them make informed decisions that are consistent with the patient’s values and wishes. Additionally, offering support services such as palliative care or counseling can help the family cope with the emotional and ethical challenges they may be facing.


In the second scenario involving physicians ordering expensive lab tests due to relationships with equipment manufacturers, the conflicting ethical principles include integrity, honesty, and justice. The physicians’ actions may raise concerns about conflicts of interest, as their decisions to order specific tests could be influenced by financial incentives rather than clinical necessity or patient benefit. As a healthcare administrator, it is essential to address these issues to ensure that patient care is not compromised and that the organization maintains ethical standards.


One appropriate action to resolve conflicts of interest in this case is to implement clear policies and guidelines regarding relationships with industry, including disclosure requirements for financial interests and restrictions on accepting gifts or payments from manufacturers. Additionally, conducting regular audits and reviews of ordering practices can help identify patterns of overutilization or inappropriate ordering of tests. It may also be necessary to provide education and training to physicians and staff about ethical principles and the importance of prioritizing patient welfare over financial considerations. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to managing conflicts of interest is essential to maintaining trust, integrity, and ethical integrity within the organization.

Part Three: Risk Assessment Framework

  • A hospital finds that hypodermic needle-stick injuries have increased over the last year and, when they conduct an audit, they find evidence that there is wide variation in practice from unit to unit. Some rooms have sharps boxes and others do not, the sharps boxes are of different sizes, and there is variation in how often they are emptied.
    • Using the seven-step risk assessment framework described by the Joint Commission (available at 7 Steps to Comply with Joint Commission) outline each of the steps to illustrate how a hospital might use a risk assessment framework to manage the risk of needle-stick injuries. (2 pages)
      • Note: Registration is required to access the link referenced above.
    • Once the seven steps have been outlined, write an email to the Director of Nursing about your concerns and recommendations.

**Risk Assessment Framework for Managing Needle-Stick Injuries:**


  1. **Establish the Context:**

Identify the scope of the risk assessment, including the specific issue of needle-stick injuries in the hospital. Gather relevant information such as the current incidence rates, practices related to sharps disposal, and any existing policies or guidelines.


  1. **Identify Hazards:**

Identify potential hazards related to needle-stick injuries, such as improper disposal of sharps, inconsistent use of sharps containers, and variation in practices across different units of the hospital.


  1. **Assess Risks:**

Evaluate the likelihood and potential consequences of needle-stick injuries occurring due to the identified hazards. Consider factors such as the frequency of exposure, the severity of injuries, and the potential for transmission of bloodborne pathogens.


  1. **Control Risks:**

Develop strategies to control and mitigate the risks of needle-stick injuries. This may include standardizing practices for sharps disposal, ensuring the availability and proper use of sharps containers in all patient rooms, and implementing regular training and education programs for staff.


  1. **Evaluate Risks:**

Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the risk control measures implemented. This may involve tracking the incidence of needle-stick injuries over time, conducting audits or inspections of sharps disposal practices, and soliciting feedback from staff members.


  1. **Treat Risks:**

Implement additional measures to address any remaining risks or areas of concern identified during the evaluation process. This could involve updating policies and procedures, providing targeted training or reinforcement of safe practices, and addressing any deficiencies in equipment or resources.


  1. **Communicate and Consult:**

Ensure that relevant stakeholders, including hospital leadership, nursing staff, infection control personnel, and occupational health and safety representatives, are informed about the findings of the risk assessment and the actions being taken to manage needle-stick injuries. Encourage open communication and collaboration to foster a culture of safety and continuous improvement.


**Email to Director of Nursing:**


Subject: Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Needle-Stick Injuries


Dear Director of Nursing,


I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to bring to your attention some concerning trends that have been identified regarding needle-stick injuries within our hospital. Over the past year, there has been a noticeable increase in needle-stick injuries reported, and upon conducting an audit, we have identified significant variation in practice across different units.


Specifically, we have found inconsistencies in the availability and use of sharps containers, with some patient rooms lacking these essential safety measures altogether. Furthermore, there is variation in the size and maintenance of sharps boxes, as well as inconsistency in the frequency of emptying these containers. Such disparities in practice pose a significant risk to both our patients and staff and require urgent attention.


In light of these findings, I would like to propose several recommendations to address this issue effectively:


  1. Standardize practices for sharps disposal across all units of the hospital, ensuring that sharps containers are readily available and consistently used in every patient room.
  2. Conduct regular audits and inspections to monitor compliance with sharps disposal protocols and identify any areas of non-compliance or improvement.
  3. Provide comprehensive training and education programs for all staff members on the proper handling and disposal of sharps, emphasizing the importance of adherence to established guidelines and protocols.
  4. Implement a system for regular maintenance and servicing of sharps containers, including the timely emptying and replacement of containers to minimize the risk of overfilling and accidental needle-stick injuries.


I believe that by taking proactive measures to address these concerns, we can effectively manage the risk of needle-stick injuries and ensure the safety and well-being of both our patients and staff. I look forward to discussing these recommendations further and working collaboratively to implement necessary changes.


Thank you for your attention to this matter.



[Your Name]

Part Four: Impact of Regulatory Guidelines on the Delivery of Care

  • You are a nursing supervisor in a small rural healthcare facility. Explain how each of the following scenarios will challenge your ability to deliver quality care and manage risks; discuss specific regulatory guidelines that may apply and explain your approach to mitigating each. Write out the following information as a report you will present to the administrative leadership about the negative implications of these issues.
    • A shortage of three certified nursing assistants (CNAs) due to influenza and one registered nurse (RN) scheduled leave for a family wedding (2–3 paragraphs)
    • Changing reimbursement rules have a negative impact on revenue that will potentially eliminate the budget for planned renovation to the patient rooms equipped with a winch to lift patients over 200 lbs. (2–3 paragraphs)

**Report on Challenges to Quality Care and Risk Management**


**Subject: Challenges and Implications for Quality Care and Risk Management**


Dear Administrative Leadership,


I am writing to bring to your attention several critical issues that are challenging our ability to deliver quality care and manage risks effectively at our healthcare facility. Below, I have outlined these issues along with their negative implications and proposed strategies for mitigating each challenge.


**1. Shortage of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Registered Nurse (RN):**

The current shortage of three CNAs due to influenza and the scheduled leave of one RN for a family wedding pose significant challenges to maintaining adequate staffing levels and delivering quality care to our patients. This staffing shortage can lead to increased workload and stress among the remaining staff, which may compromise patient safety and satisfaction. Additionally, it can result in delays in care, inadequate monitoring of patients, and decreased overall efficiency in our operations.


Regulatory Guidelines:

– The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) require healthcare facilities to maintain appropriate staffing levels to ensure the provision of safe and quality care to patients. Failure to meet these standards can result in penalties and loss of accreditation.

– The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates that healthcare facilities provide a safe working environment for employees, including adequate staffing levels to prevent workplace hazards and injuries.


Mitigation Strategy:

– Implement a contingency staffing plan to address the current shortage, such as hiring temporary staff or utilizing per diem nurses from staffing agencies.

– Cross-train existing staff members to perform essential tasks normally assigned to CNAs or RNs to fill in the gaps caused by the shortage.

– Communicate openly with patients and families about the staffing situation, reassuring them of our commitment to their care and safety despite the staffing challenges.


**2. Impact of Changing Reimbursement Rules on Revenue:**

The changing reimbursement rules that have resulted in a negative impact on revenue pose a significant threat to our budget and planned renovation projects, particularly the renovation of patient rooms equipped with winches to lift patients over 200 lbs. The potential elimination of funding for these renovations can hinder our ability to provide quality care to patients with mobility issues and may compromise their safety and comfort during their stay at our facility.


Regulatory Guidelines:

– The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates that healthcare facilities implement measures to protect patient privacy and confidentiality, including the use of appropriate equipment and facilities for patient care.

– The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires healthcare facilities to provide accessible accommodations and services for individuals with disabilities, including adequate equipment for patient lifting and transfer.


Mitigation Strategy:

– Advocate for alternative funding sources or reimbursement models to offset the revenue loss and ensure funding for critical renovation projects, such as seeking grants or donations from community organizations or government agencies.

– Prioritize renovation projects based on patient needs and safety concerns, ensuring that essential upgrades, such as equipment for patient lifting and transfer, are addressed first to meet regulatory requirements and enhance patient care.


In conclusion, addressing these challenges requires proactive planning, collaboration, and strategic decision-making to safeguard the quality of care and manage risks effectively in our healthcare facility. By implementing the proposed mitigation strategies and staying vigilant to emerging issues, we can ensure the continued delivery of safe, high-quality care to our patients.




[Your Name]

Nursing Supervisor

Part Five: Is healthcare a right or a privilege?

  • Provide your opinion about whether healthcare in the U.S. should be is a right or a privilege. Apply ethical standards and state and federal laws to support your position.  Write your position as though you are sharing it through a blog post or letter to the editor of a local paper.  (1–2 pages)

Dear Editor,


In the ongoing debate about healthcare in the United States, one fundamental question often arises: Is healthcare a right or a privilege? This question strikes at the core of our societal values, ethical standards, and legal frameworks. As a healthcare professional, I firmly believe that healthcare is a fundamental right that should be accessible to all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background.


First and foremost, the ethical principle of justice demands that all members of society have equal access to essential healthcare services. Every individual deserves the opportunity to live a healthy and fulfilling life, and denying healthcare based on financial or social factors violates this fundamental principle. By recognizing healthcare as a right, we uphold the inherent dignity and worth of every human being, ensuring that no one is left behind or marginalized due to their inability to pay for medical care.


Furthermore, various state and federal laws support the notion of healthcare as a right rather than a privilege. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, aimed to expand access to affordable health insurance coverage for millions of Americans, emphasizing the importance of preventive care, mental health services, and essential health benefits. Medicaid, a joint federal and state program, provides health coverage to millions of low-income individuals and families, safeguarding their right to healthcare services.


Additionally, the principle of beneficence, which underscores the moral obligation to promote the well-being of others, reinforces the argument for healthcare as a right. Access to timely and comprehensive healthcare not only improves individual health outcomes but also contributes to the overall health and prosperity of society. By investing in preventive care, early intervention, and chronic disease management, we can reduce healthcare disparities, enhance population health, and mitigate the burden of preventable diseases on our healthcare system.


In conclusion, the recognition of healthcare as a right aligns with our ethical principles, legal obligations, and moral values as a society. By ensuring universal access to healthcare services, we uphold the principles of justice, beneficence, and compassion, fostering a healthier, more equitable future for all Americans.




[Your Name]


Part Six: Behavioral Ethics

  • Visit the ACHE Ethics Pre-Assessment website (http://www.ache.org/newclub/career/ethself.cfm) and take the ethics pre-assessment to help you identify areas where your ethics are strong and where they might need further reflection. After reviewing your responses to the pre-assessment
  • Describe your results from the ACHE Ethics Pre-Assessment including the areas where your ethics are strong and where there might be red flags.
  • Explain what you might do to change any red flags that might exist. Finally, describe what resources you think would help you promote integrity and ethics as a leader of healthcare organizations.


When reviewing the results of an ethics pre-assessment, it’s essential to identify both areas of strength and areas that may require further reflection or improvement. Areas where your ethics are strong may include demonstrating integrity, honesty, and transparency in decision-making, respecting confidentiality and privacy, and upholding professional standards of conduct.


On the other hand, red flags may appear in areas where ethical dilemmas arise, such as conflicts of interest, decision-making under pressure, or balancing competing interests. It’s crucial to recognize these areas as opportunities for growth and reflection rather than shortcomings.


To address any red flags identified in the assessment, consider engaging in further education, training, or self-reflection on ethics-related topics. This may involve participating in ethics workshops or seminars, seeking guidance from mentors or colleagues with expertise in ethics, or reading literature on ethical leadership and decision-making.


Additionally, promoting integrity and ethics as a leader in healthcare organizations requires creating a culture that prioritizes ethical behavior and decision-making. This can be achieved by establishing clear ethical guidelines and policies, providing ongoing ethics education and training for staff, and fostering open communication channels where ethical concerns can be raised and addressed.


Furthermore, incorporating ethical considerations into strategic planning, decision-making processes, and performance evaluations can help reinforce the importance of ethics throughout the organization. By actively promoting integrity and ethics, healthcare leaders can contribute to building a culture of trust, accountability, and ethical responsibility within their organizations.

 Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges

The post Legal Requirements and Ethics: Summarize legal mandates and ethical principles to address complex challenges appeared first on Destiny Papers.

Trustworthy Platform for Your Nursing Assignments

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!